Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101228
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 20:45
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 84 2-Core 138 59% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 206 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% XFX(1682 400F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 6 Parallax 1.1 2% 3.1 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 3.1 2% 3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 91 94 85 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 97 Write 103 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 89.7 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 3.1 3.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	9.35% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 10.5 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 3.7 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.35% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.A146G.C210C 947F SH564568FH8N6PHSFG 4GB 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.5% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 14 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-PIQ57BQ Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	13x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	30x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	7x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	3x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	3x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	11x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	9x
FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 1604 FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 31%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16