Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 20:15
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 309
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 770
83% 661 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 118
Parallax 31.6
24% 59.5 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 23.7
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 821 175 247 183 160 227 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,321
Write 1,301
Mixed 1,144
SusWrite 302
228% 1,017 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.3
214% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 928
623% 764 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 168%
Great: 253%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
370GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 1146 1122 1143 1176 1069 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 24.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 18.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 80: 10R 10G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
80% 57% 35 298 210 144 15.5" 1536 864 BOE090F
History: Score 32: 3R 5G 2B | Score 80: 10R 10G 0B
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback