Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 79.3 1-Core 132 2-Core 264 86% 159 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 510 68% 508 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 43.2 Parallax 38.8 32% 40.6 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 33.7 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 208 95 95 105 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 451 Write 384 Mixed 356 SusWrite 149 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 39.3 156% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 215 189% 281 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 91%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 133 133 133 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 141 Write 133 Mixed 94.6 SusWrite 132 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 20.1 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 19.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23.8"	1280 720	XKX2405 LED-2405S

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	389x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	342x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	116x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	84x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	74x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	130x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	49x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	48x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	62x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16