Asrock X299 Creator

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 135% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Creator (all builds)
Memory	84.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration	524 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850 3,007 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 62.6 1-Core 130 2-Core 270 81% 154 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 991 86% 733 Pts	64-Core 1,852 115% 1,852 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 218 Reflection 189 Parallax 188 178% 198 fps	MRender 193 Gravity 144 Splatting 132 125% 156 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 324 318 316 307 307 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 328 Mixed 287 SusWrite 318 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 44.2 172% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 260 216% 312 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 130%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 457GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1770 1774 1776 1820 1811 1824 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,420 Write 1,904 Mixed 1,375 SusWrite 1,796 420% 1,874 MB/s	4K Read 60.7 4K Write 192 4K Mixed 85 302% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 1,166 DQ Write 879 DQ Mixed 994 751% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 989GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2626 2633 2631 1500 1453 1480 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	370% Outstanding	Read 2,488 Write 2164 Mixed 1,717 SusWrite 2,054 473% 2,106 MB/s	4K Read 65.9 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 96.1 320% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,186 DQ Write 857 DQ Mixed 1,022 764% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 370% Great: 435%
Areca ARC-1226-VOL#000 12TB 474GB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 243 245 252 238 251 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 2TB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 98 95 90 96 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	9.79% Terrible	Read 57.6 Write 104 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 85.4 17% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 0.7 8% 4.23 MB/s	DQ Read 1.7 DQ Write 4.3 DQ Mixed 2.1 2% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 19%
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 288GB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 96 107 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 99.6 Mixed 51 SusWrite 104 16% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 0.6 8% 4.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1.6 DQ Write 5.8 DQ Mixed 2 2% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 19%
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 36GB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 91 89 87 102 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	9.7% Terrible	Read 52.6 Write 97.2 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 84.3 17% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 0.7 8% 4.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1.6 DQ Write 2.5 DQ Mixed 2.6 2% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.7% Great: 19%
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 83GB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 113 116 108 116 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 82.2 Write 110 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 102 20% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 0.7 8% 4.63 MB/s	DQ Read 1.3 DQ Write 3 DQ Mixed 2.7 2% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 19%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 164 159 166 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 122 Mixed 68.9 SusWrite 163 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 33.4 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 13.6 18% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 35 Write 34.3 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 25.9 23% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 96%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 227GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 38 37 37 38 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 33 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 36.8 43% 32 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 22%
Kingston DTLocker+G3 64GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 48GB free, PID 169d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 38.8 Write 37.6 Mixed 37 SusWrite 38.2 52% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 5.5 506% 6.77 MB/s	DQ Read 7 DQ Write 9.4 DQ Mixed 6.4 563% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905743-045.A00G 8x16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 28.7 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 8.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Creator Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 172%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Creator

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	24x
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	21x
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples	18x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	23x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	11x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,275Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	9x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
8x16GBUnknownBench 104%, 2,632 samples	12x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $731

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16