Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409MA
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 00:45
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 112
42% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 95.3
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 94
6% 94 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1D91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 192 198 199 185 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 658
Write 461
Mixed 586
SusWrite 221
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 21.6
70% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 155
119% 163 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 199%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
22GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.9 6 5.8 3 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 8.9
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 5.5
11% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
58% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 18%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.6 2.4 6 6 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 14.1
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 4.9
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.6
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 14" 1280 720 BOE08B2
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback