Avell G1550 RTX MUV/ A65 RTX MUV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAvell G1550 RTX MUV/ A65 RTX MUV  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell G1550 RTX MUV/ A65 RTX MUV
Memory9.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 00:42
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 132
56% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 424
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.3% Good
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 110
Parallax 66.4
56% 81.7 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 79
Splatting 78.8
74% 93.2 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 83%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 105F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.7
5% 8.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 512GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 50 51 111 3.6 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.7% Poor
Read 114
Write 1.5
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 65.9
11% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 37.9
40% 70.6 MB/s
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
875GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 77 56 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 58.5
Write 108
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 89.8
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
402GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 29 24 36 36 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 26.8
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 30.8
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.3
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
482GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 72 85 85 85 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 85.5
Write 78.8
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 76.2
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 15.9
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 4 0 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical G1550 RTX MUV/ A65 RTX MUV Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Avell G1550 RTX MUV/ A65 RTX MUV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback