Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Memory 24.2 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 14.2 14% 18.9 Pts	4-Core 15.8 8-Core 28.2 3% 22 Pts	64-Core 19.3 1% 19.3 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 3 2% 2.47 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GB 4,961 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 82 47 59 45 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 359 Write 120 Mixed 186 SusWrite 69.1 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 12.1 46% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 64.6 DQ Write 45.6 DQ Mixed 72 49% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.18% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 1.5 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.5 2% 0.63 GB/s	Latency 291 14% 291 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	485x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	458x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,364x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	488x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16