Medion ERAZER X7855 MD60892

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion ERAZER X7855 MD60892 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION PA70HP6GM
Memory	5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170911
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 20:23
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 162 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 383 43% 337 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 67B4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.6% Average	Lighting 56.5 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 59.9 46% 61.2 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 60.6 Splatting 61.2 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,527 Write 1,018 Mixed 693 238% 1,079 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 42.4 154% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 439 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 505 355% 447 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1500LM012-1R817G 1.5TB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 227GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 34 36 36 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 11 Write 10.5 Mixed 44 SusWrite 32.8 19% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 71%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB 4,756 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 34 35 36 37 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 87.1 Write 104 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 33.7 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 146% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB 62,266 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.7% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 20.9 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 64: 8R 8G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
64%	70%	23	176	89	120	17.2"	1920 1080	AUO149D

History: Score 27: 3R 3G 3B | Score 64: 8R 8G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X7855 MD60892 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Medion ERAZER X7855 MD60892

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	5x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16