Alienware 18

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Alienware 18 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0FT9KT
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	230.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 46.2 29% 41.9 Pts	4-Core 88.1 8-Core 126 13% 107 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 05AB) 3GB CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 426.06 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.8 Reflection 18.8 Parallax 24.3 15% 20.6 fps	MRender 22.7 Gravity 24.8 Splatting 19.4 18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 124 133 148 147 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 415 Write 130 Mixed 168 SusWrite 152 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 6.8 36% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 30.6 43% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 728GB free Firmware: AX0P2D SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 100 101 100 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 95.4 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 99.9 59% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.2 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 54: 9R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
54%	44%	36	206	108	60	18.5"	1536 864	SDC4C48

History: Score 11: 2R 0G 1B | Score 54: 9R 1G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 18 Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Alienware 18

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	61x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	58x
Core i7-4710MQIntel $50Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 880MNvidiaBench 28%, 2,147 samples	106x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	53x
GTX 780MNvidiaBench 23%, 3,739 samples	47x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 128GBAdata $30Bench 77%, 32,167 samples	11x
hynix SH920 mSATA 256GBSKBench 70%, 756 samples	10x
DMT-80M6M-11 mSATA 80GBLiteonitBench 67%, 888 samples	10x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	27x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,917 samples	25x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 53%, 1,119 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16