PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z170M-PLUS |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170210 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 20 '21 at 16:37 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
83.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 424 424 423 422 424 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
23GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 12 12 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2187 MHz
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | PHLC156 PHL 273V7 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 208x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 156x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 141x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 169x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 146x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 129x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $222 |