Acer Aspire TC-105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-105  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-105
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 51.2
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 103
43% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 150
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.7
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 13 28 31 91 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 60.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 42
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 114%
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 1 6TB
2TB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 174
Write 171
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 39.8
153% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 100%
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 2 6TB
686GB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 85.6
Write 84.3
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 39.9
90% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 45%
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 3 6TB
2TB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 39.9
118% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 48%
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 4 6TB
300GB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 118 108 119 119 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 95.4
Write 95.9
Mixed 68
SusWrite 115
128% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 33% 24 88 5 60 27" 1920 1080 PHLC07C Philips 273EL
Typical Aspire TC-105 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback