PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Aspire TC-105 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Aspire TC-105 |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131224 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 20 '21 at 16:23 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 13 28 31 91 67 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 1 6TB
2TB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
|
42.8%
Average
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 2 6TB
686GB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 3 6TB
2TB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 4 6TB
300GB free, PID 025f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 118 108 119 119 122 MB/s
|
46.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24% | 33% | 24 | 88 | 5 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | PHLC07C Philips 273EL |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples | 54x |
A8-6500 APUAMD $135Bench 50%, 7,219 samples | 7x |
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples | 14x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 5x |
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $196 |