Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory42.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 709
69% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,297
80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 68
Parallax 60.8
47% 62.3 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 52.9
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M 250GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,167
Write 965
Mixed 384
185% 838 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68.6
190% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 732
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 68.1
215% 469 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 229%
Patriot Burst 240GB
121GB free
Firmware: SBFMKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 432 423 426 426 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 420
Mixed 350
SusWrite 352
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 35.9
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 136
133% 204 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
3GB free
Firmware: 13057113
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.4
Write 78.5
Mixed 64.8
59% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
929GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 185 188 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 155
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 187
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 126 125 127 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 125
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 104%
Kingston UHS-II SD Reader 32GB
26GB free, PID 3306
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 33 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 45.2
Write 33.3
Mixed 18
SusWrite 32
41% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
79% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback