Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 56.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 207 67% 123 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 417 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen05sm21ar256sdkm2 256GB 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 259 329 281 322 332 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 309 Write 342 Mixed 330 SusWrite 293 72% 318 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 24.8 96% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 50.4 70% 125 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 90%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 920GB free Firmware: ZZZZ SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 98 108 127 122 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 133 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 112 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB 6,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 11.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.2 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $358

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16