Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 12:20
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G860-$73 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 91.5 1-Core 76.3 2-Core 158 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 155 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8411) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.47 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 477GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 351 313 321 357 363 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 406 Write 372 Mixed 344 SusWrite 335 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 35.7 120% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 52.3 46% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-001.A00LF 2x2GB 395 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 17.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23"	1280 720	PHLC0B3 Philips 236V4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	387x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16