Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 184% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 185% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 09:53
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 77.5 1-Core 143 2-Core 274 89% 165 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 868 84% 689 Pts	64-Core 1,382 86% 1,382 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% MSI(1462 3897) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Lighting 329 Reflection 414 Parallax 335 268% 359 fps	MRender 348 Gravity 261 Splatting 190 209% 266 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 240 183 186 180 179 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 452 Write 401 Mixed 359 SusWrite 224 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 45.9 153% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 185 139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 838GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 392 369 383 406 421 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 420 Mixed 410 SusWrite 391 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 56.4 183% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 183 138% 186 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB 5,027 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 297GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1922 834 609 609 600 606 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 128%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB 8,393 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 450GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 392 369 384 407 421 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 259 Write 280 Mixed 214 SusWrite 391 65% 286 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 39.9 104% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 185 140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 189GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 271 265 273 274 273 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 461 Write 394 Mixed 370 SusWrite 283 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 43.8 143% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 152 124% 176 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 690GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 91 94 92 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 75.2 Write 73.4 Mixed 65 SusWrite 91.9 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 67%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB 1,358 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 5.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 185 203 200 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 182 Mixed 90.1 SusWrite 193 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 439% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 11,284 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 34.4 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 32.9 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	144	31.5"	1280 720	AOC3220 AG322QWS4R4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16