Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 720
65% 548 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 52.4
45% 62.5 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 65.7
54% 66 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 50 1.1 1.6 37 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 310
Write 104
Mixed 202
SusWrite 35.1
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 7.6
33% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 78.7
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 24.2
24% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 61%
Drevo X1 Pro 512GB
145GB free
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 320 162 417 416 411 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 393
Write 404
Mixed 354
SusWrite 346
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 28.7
97% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 68.1
DQ Mixed 115
102% 161 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
459GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 1065 315 962 794 795 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 2344
Write 1,456
Mixed 1,566
SusWrite 852
346% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 35.4
136% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 56.7
DQ Mixed 94
146% 300 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 205%
Great: 355%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 112 52 127 127 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 31
SusWrite 111
66% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 103 49 123 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 103
SusWrite 106
149% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2133C13 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.1% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 26.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 2R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 7% 106 109 6 60 27" 1920 1080 BNQ78B1 BenQ G2750
Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback