Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6500 3,335 User benchmarks, average bench 34% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 57.7 36% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 56.3 8-Core 57.3 8% 56.8 Pts	64-Core 58 4% 58 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 9,615 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9056) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 0.9 2% 2 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 179 206 210 189 137 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.8% Average	Read 182 Write 98.6 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 182 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 23.4 59% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 111 84% 114 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	0"	1280 720	MS_0000

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples	2x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GBBench 78%, 11,560 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16