Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 143% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 150% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 70.4 1-Core 151 2-Core 293 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 1,156 103% 870 Pts	64-Core 1,422 88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	163% Outstanding	Lighting 218 Reflection 208 Parallax 241 178% 222 fps	MRender 275 Gravity 222 Splatting 177 179% 225 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$100 2,434 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: C2.1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 137 114 101 96 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 980 Write 373 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 123 84% 389 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 54.6 148% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 378 DQ Mixed 90.4 142% 268 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 181%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 70GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 259 264 283 283 283 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 448 Mixed 392 SusWrite 295 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 57.2 189% 64.5 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 202 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 691GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 124 123 124 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 69 Write 73 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 122 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 83%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$40 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 208GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 112 113 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 96 Write 90.3 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 111 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 405GB free Firmware: MEAOA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 66 67 66 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 65.3 Write 71.8 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 65.4 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 66%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 95 106 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 104 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114 144,399 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.4% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 26.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 26.7 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 29: 3R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	22%	49	340	278	30	27.2"	2560 1440	GSM5B08 LG Ultra HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $929

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16