Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 14:16
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 772
81% 651 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 68.8
59% 71.9 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 67.2
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 200 513 531 531 533 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,633
Write 628
Mixed 1,238
SusWrite 489
221% 997 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 85.4
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 312
310% 506 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 212%
Great: 277%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
82GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 389 61 25 31 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 510
Write 444
Mixed 399
SusWrite 98.4
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 12.5
70% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 27.5
DQ Mixed 25.9
32% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 28.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 27.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP286A HP ZR24w
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback