Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 199
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 286
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 39.6
35% 41.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 28.1
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 194 192 176 174 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 344
Mixed 261
SusWrite 195
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 40.2
143% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 135
149% 254 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung MZNLH256HAJD-000H1 256GB
92GB free
Firmware: RVT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 427 396 206 207 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 467
Mixed 430
SusWrite 302
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 48.3
159% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 298
222% 293 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 154 155 158 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 152
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 154
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
148GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 117 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66% Good
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 115
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 32.6
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 5R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 11% 115 324 257 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0C1C S27E390
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 39: 5R 3G 5B
Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $240
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback