Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '21 at 00:12
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 69.1 1-Core 106 2-Core 208 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 614 60% 491 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 28.1 16% 37.2 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 15.1 14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 72 56 55 58 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 1,351 Write 910 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 92.1 130% 595 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 18.6 108% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 14.1 DQ Mixed 30.3 58% 126 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 209%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 698GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 120 121 115 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 123 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 118 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB 9,568 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 27 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 23.3 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	17.3"	1280 701	AUO429D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	246x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	243x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	210x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	144x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	135x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	266x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	111x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	20x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	84x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16