PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190514 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '21 at 23:41 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
85.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
JAJS600M256C 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07347
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 391 438 439 454 445 MB/s
|
95.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
45.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 11 | 9 | 60 | 20" | 1280 720 | ACR020B Acer S202HL |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,299x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,141x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 135x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 564x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 308x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 267x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |