PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190906 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '21 at 23:13 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | ECU-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
133GB free
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 251 269 224 32 204 MB/s
|
65%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 486 536 471 479 460 MB/s
|
133%
Outstanding
|
|||
Adata SU630 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: Y200225a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 236 248 236 295 233 MB/s
|
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
797GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 138 139 140 139 MB/s
|
79.7%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 7 | 6 | 60 | 19.5" | 1280 720 | HKC0000 QMS20 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 595x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 230x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 191x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 241x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 175x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 150x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |