Acer Predator G3-571

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Predator G3-571 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Sienta_KLS
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 23:07
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 46.3 1-Core 35.7 2-Core 110 36% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 307 32% 258 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 118A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6576 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.54% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 84.3 Parallax 7.4 6% 33 fps	MRender 9.2 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 11.2 8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.54% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 119 103 122 119 113 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 225 Write 117 Mixed 145 SusWrite 118 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 10.7 40% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 79 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 108 83% 111 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 91%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 16GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 13 9.1 12 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 11.7 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 13 5% 7.15 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0 30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 6,230 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.4% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 22.9 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 9R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	23%	65	172	67	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO61ED

History: Score 45: 5R 4G 8B | Score 63: 6R 10G 3B | Score 71: 10R 6G 3B | Score 61: 9R 5G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3-571 Builds (Compare 1,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Acer Predator G3-571

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,554x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	793x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	770x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	2x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	531x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	257x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	97x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	423x
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 11,019 samples	269x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 13,778 samples	262x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16