NA ZBOX-CI327NANO-GS-01

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	NA ZBOX-CI327NANO-GS-01 (all builds)
Motherboard	NA ZBOX-CI327NANO-GS-01
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170825
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 21:39
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 68.8 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 185 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 498 53% 420 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.9% Very good	Lighting 92.6 Reflection 104 Parallax 90.7 76% 95.9 fps	MRender 89.5 Gravity 81.4 Splatting 79.3 68% 83.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 261 268 254 248 259 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 492 Write 457 Mixed 343 SusWrite 255 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 20 85% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 186 162% 240 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 126%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 57GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 59 63 61 60 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 78.9 Write 117 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 61.2 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.6 189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB 629 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.4% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 4R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	26%	31	105	5	60	31.5"	1920 1080	SAM0D34 C32F391

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBOX-CI327NANO-GS-01 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: NA ZBOX-CI327NANO-GS-01

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	11x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
S510 120GBAdataBench 67%, 690 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GBUndeBench 28%, 24 samples	2x
1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 3,554 samples	1x
EBJ41UF8BDU5-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 49%, 176 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16