Asrock Z77 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 21:20
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 160
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 472
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 88.5
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 47.4
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 18 21 23 24 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.3% Very poor
Read 100
Write 40.6
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 21.9
12% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 5.5
15% 5.47 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 27.8
DQ Mixed 14.1
14% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
179GB free
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 74.4
Write 67
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 76
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 48%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
81GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 26 33 35 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 60.5
Write 114
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 32.2
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 75%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
72GB free
Firmware: GJ002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 66 66 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 55
Write 52.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 65.6
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 8R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 11% 111 286 212 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM090A SMS27B750V
History: Score 47: 6R 5G 2B | Score 52: 8R 4G 0B
Typical Z77 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $506
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback