Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	21 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 175 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 494 51% 409 Pts	64-Core 476 30% 476 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.4% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 57 Parallax 72.4 48% 62.6 fps	MRender 56.9 Gravity 58.4 Splatting 39.8 41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC210 2.5 7MM 256GB 806 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20001L00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 152 141 133 135 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 435 Write 187 Mixed 182 SusWrite 148 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 21.6 89% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 122 130% 218 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 84%
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$60 4,076 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 753GB free Firmware: PA03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 116 117 117 115 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 120 Write 108 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 116 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1119 S939A2UGS-ITR 1119 S939A2UGS-ITR 32GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.8% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 14.9 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.1 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 49: 5R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
49%	16%	117	240	159	75	32"	2560 1440	HPN360C HP 32 QHD

History: Score 22: 2R 2G 6B | Score 49: 5R 5G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87M-D3H Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	160x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	82x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	70x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	20x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	18x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16