Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 21:16
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 121 2-Core 232 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 541 59% 466 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 10C1) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 27.3 20% 27.5 fps	MRender 34.4 Gravity 0 Splatting 19.6 15% 18 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB 18,233 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 122 98 92 88 82 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	64% Good	Read 514 Write 140 Mixed 193 SusWrite 103 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 20.7 99% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 161 123% 169 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 115%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 687GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 115 115 115 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70% Good	Read 129 Write 115 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 114 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.7 203% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 12.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 13.9 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 50: 5R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
50%	28%	65	289	209	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO38ED

History: Score 24: 3R 1G 6B | Score 50: 5R 6G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,692x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	920x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,555x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,056x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	324x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	874x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16