Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 21:15
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 97.8 1-Core 125 2-Core 242 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 602 63% 503 Pts	64-Core 608 38% 608 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% PNY(196E 100A) 3GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.1% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 87.6 52% 74.7 fps	MRender 82.4 Gravity 75 Splatting 60.7 58% 72.7 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 128GB 128GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0722A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 208 219 95 77 68 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46% Average	Read 251 Write 211 Mixed 195 SusWrite 135 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 15.3 73% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 78.7 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 21.9 48% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 220GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 431 449 445 451 352 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 457 Mixed 440 SusWrite 406 100% 442 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 43 153% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 365 275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 171GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1278 1280 780 778 780 778 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 2,056 Write 1,781 Mixed 1680 SusWrite 946 362% 1,616 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 73.6 224% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 643 DQ Write 448 DQ Mixed 568 418% 553 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 355%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 320GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 37 41 34 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 18.2 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 35.2 27% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 43%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 2,535 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 8GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.6 11 9.6 11 9.6 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 93.3 Write 21.2 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 10.2 32% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 39% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 35%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 800a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.7 5.1 5.6 5.6 5.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 6 Write 6.8 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 5 6% 4.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 4%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 71GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 82.7 Write 61 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 52.2 80% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 3,641 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 24.3 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 22.7 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 47 85% 47 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	7.2"	1280 720	TCL0000 MT5531

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	331x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	187x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16