Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150 15,293 User benchmarks, average bench 80% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 74.4 1-Core 129 2-Core 245 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 510 57% 447 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Asus(1043 86CC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67% Good	Lighting 88.5 Reflection 111 Parallax 59 72% 86.1 fps	MRender 62.4 Gravity 77.1 Splatting 68.9 57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 206 203 192 86 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 411 Write 200 Mixed 213 SusWrite 182 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 26.5 104% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 62.3 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 92.1 78% 110 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 85%
Seagate ST2000DM008 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 145GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 170 163 157 174 162 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 90.8 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 163 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.7% Very good	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 31.2 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 21.4 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 91.6 44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	6	4	75	23.8"	1920 1057	HGC2400 Q24

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	838x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	296x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	226x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16