Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U 15,631 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 33.8 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 123 41% 75.8 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 57%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 87 94 91 87 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 295 Write 137 Mixed 132 SusWrite 87.8 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 21 58% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 72 DQ Mixed 97.7 78% 111 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	296x
Ryzen 3 2200UAMDBench 45%, 15,631 samples	286x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples	171x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	291x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	285x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	171x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	44x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	43x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	37x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	176x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	88x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	69x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16