Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 186 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 607 60% 489 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580 5,936 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 0.6 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 335 Series 180GB-$169 2,872 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 335u SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 127 141 145 150 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 338 Write 212 Mixed 231 SusWrite 145 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 28.3 101% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 216 170% 239 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 251GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 101 102 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 102 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 101 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 1x8GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16