Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H310M-M.2 PLUS
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 11:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 372
47% 358 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 81.6
48% 66.7 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 40.3
42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDVPSA181024 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 340 361 367 387 388 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 428
Write 375
Mixed 312
SusWrite 364
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 21.1
122% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 32.9
66% 131 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 83%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
918GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 171 174 174 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 165
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 172
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 7.2" 1280 701 SAM0902 SAMSUNG
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback