Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 136% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 11:06
Run Duration	346 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 78.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 271 88% 162 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 982 91% 761 Pts	64-Core 1,347 83% 1,347 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gainward(10B0 2488) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 223 Reflection 211 Parallax 200 182% 211 fps	MRender 201 Gravity 155 Splatting 138 132% 165 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$104 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 336GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2746 2336 1669 1690 1690 1720 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,828 Write 3,068 Mixed 2,865 SusWrite 1,975 605% 2,684 MB/s	4K Read 67.2 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 84.6 273% 90.1 MB/s	DQ Read 690 DQ Write 462 DQ Mixed 596 439% 583 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 488%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 302GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 205 205 203 205 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 376 Write 357 Mixed 322 SusWrite 205 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 42.2 143% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 151 114% 152 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 587GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 205 204 205 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 374 Write 356 Mixed 330 SusWrite 205 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 42.5 144% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 152 114% 152 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 124%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 147 149 150 149 151 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 150 Write 108 Mixed 94 SusWrite 148 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 101%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: 01.01M02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 150 147 140 149 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 126 Write 128 Mixed 71.1 SusWrite 144 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.5 214% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 931GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 125 123 125 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 83.5 Write 87 Mixed 56 SusWrite 124 64% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 90%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 676GB free Firmware: 01.01M02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 126 130 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 113 Write 126 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 128 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.4 194% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 111%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 102 104 104 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 101 Write 94.6 Mixed 87 SusWrite 103 71% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 118 126 128 126 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 71 Write 116 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 123 68% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 443GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 96 95 98 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 68.3 Write 61 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 95.2 51% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 90%
WD WD121PURZ-85GUCY0 12TB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 5.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 206 204 206 204 206 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 196 Mixed 100 SusWrite 205 129% 176 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 1.4 387% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 138%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB 3,542 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2TB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 106 107 106 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 106 126% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.4% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 26.4 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 24 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 27.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 156%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	60	24.1"	1280 720	ENC2956 CS2420

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,916x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,341x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,104x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,103x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	879x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,375Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	611x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	707x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	434x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	185x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,453

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16