PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7996 |
Motherboard | MSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996) (all builds) |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171204 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '21 at 10:04 |
Run Duration | 246 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 47 54 52 53 50 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
29GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 116 167 116 118 103 MB/s
|
79.3%
Very good
|
|||
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
75GB free
Firmware: PC3ZC70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 55 55 55 MB/s
|
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 1TB
286GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 38 30 40 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50% | 18% | 88 | 105 | 6 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | BNQ78A1 BenQ GL2250H |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 517x |
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 414x |
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 407x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 641x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 330x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 215x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $257 |