| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H410M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200810 |
| Uptime | 3.5 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 18 '21 at 08:32 |
| Run Duration | 237 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-10400-$117
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
84% 150 Pts
|
71% 590 Pts
|
61% 986 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.6%
Average
|
45% 53.5 fps
|
37% 45.7 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSTK.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.6%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
33% 11.4 GB/s
|
59% 67.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 56: 8R 3G 7B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56% | 25% | 71 | 322 | 252 | 165 | 31.5" | 1920 1080 | ACR0805 ED320QR |
History: Score 12: 0R 3G 3B | Score 56: 8R 3G 7B
Typical H410M-HDV Builds (Compare 835 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 200x |
| Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 164x |
| Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples | 161x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 60x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 55x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $328 |