Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 40.3 1-Core 3.5 2-Core 9.2 15% 17.7 Pts	4-Core 7.2 8-Core 13.4 1% 10.3 Pts	64-Core 21 1% 21 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35 9,368 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0003LVM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 57 47 40 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 35.8 Write 50.5 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 44.9 29% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 50%
Generic External 320GB 1,251 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.49% Terrible	Read 8.3 Write 19 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 19.1 20% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.49% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3150ED58E8W1600 1x2GB 670 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.08% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 1.1 4% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.08% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16