HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DA
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200323
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 05:56
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 697
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 84DA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 38.3
32% 39.1 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 26.7
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128-HP 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 60 60 60 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 896
Write 97.3
Mixed 195
SusWrite 77.1
68% 316 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 29.4
115% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 54.7
DQ Mixed 102
108% 190 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86%
Great: 337%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
149GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 93 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 93.3
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
195GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 203 208 207 208 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 118%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
15GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 161 159 118 133 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 164
Mixed 114
SusWrite 144
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
430% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 94%
WD Elements 1TB
23GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 28 26 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 54.4
Write 36.1
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 26.7
43% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 27" 1280 720 DELA193 DELL S2721Q
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback