PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120608 |
Uptime | 2.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '21 at 05:54 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
|
83%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 74 80 137 19 49 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
194GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 100 117 106 108 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
Generic External 500GB
66GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.6 4 0.5 2.2 0.9 MB/s
|
1.6%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21% | 23% | 31 | 109 | 6 | 60 | 32" | 1360 768 | MST0030 MStar Demo |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 115x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 98x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 41x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 47x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $526 |