ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq dc5700 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq dc5700 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A60h
Memory	1.5 GB free of 5.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070413
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 04:03
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 39.8 31% 41.6 Pts	4-Core 41.3 8-Core 39.1 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 39.3 2% 39.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03150010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 176 173 64 60 61 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39% Below average	Read 201 Write 171 Mixed 156 SusWrite 115 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 21.4 70% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 36.7 30% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 100%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 149GB free Firmware: 3.CHF SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 69 Write 33.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 73.2 40% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 42%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36 2,469 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 149GB free Firmware: HP07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 57.9 Write 57.4 Mixed 37 SusWrite 66.5 40% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 38%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 149GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 79 79 75 72 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 76.2 Write 61.5 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 72.2 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 38GB 3,056 User benchmarks, average bench 16% null MHz 512, 512, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 21%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback