Default string

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Default string (all builds)
Motherboard	JGINYUE X99M-PLUS V2
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210126
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 02:52
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 79 2-Core 201 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 805 71% 603 Pts	64-Core 1,069 66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% PowerColor(148C 2359) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1475 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 48.7 Parallax 57.8 37% 50.6 fps	MRender 46.9 Gravity 45 Splatting 34.1 34% 42 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 42 31 46 54 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 423 Write 372 Mixed 343 SusWrite 91.1 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 0.6 33% 9.1 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 29.4 42% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 100%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 26GB free Firmware: 1118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 92 89 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 85.7 Write 94.3 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 91.3 61% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB-3200 1x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.4% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 53: 5R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
53%	43%	44	325	259	60	72.3"	1360 768	SNY4402 SONY TV

History: Score 17: 0R 4G 5B | Score 68: 8R 6G 10B | Score 53: 5R 7G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Default string

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	1,018x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples	956x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	906x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	486x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	458x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	331x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	171x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	150x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,365x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	488x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16