Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140515
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 02:02
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 226 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 553 57% 459 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 2980) 3GB CLim: 1376 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 78.5 48% 68.3 fps	MRender 80.3 Gravity 70.4 Splatting 59.9 56% 70.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 194 Write 112 Mixed 154 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 25.7 97% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 78.6 DQ Write 99.8 DQ Mixed 61.7 54% 80 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 64GB free Firmware: 12.01C01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 77 77 78 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 63.6 Write 58 SusWrite 75.5 47% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 51%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 229GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 66 67 75 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 47.6 Write 61 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 67.2 38% 52.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 79%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 45GB free Firmware: GKAOA70M SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 45.5 Write 50.4 Mixed 29 SusWrite 55 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 46%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 30GB free, PID 00d4 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 10 9.8 8.9 10 9.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	9.17% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 6.2 Mixed 9 SusWrite 9.7 14% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 83% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 11%
IT1172 USB Flash Disk 7GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 5GB free, PID 1172 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.7 3.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 1 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 2.8 5% 4.82 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 3%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 434 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 475GB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 106 106 107 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 110 Write 110 Mixed 73 SusWrite 106 134% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 72%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 17GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.77 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G F3-10666CL8-2GBXM F3-10666CL8-2GBXM 20GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.3% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 19.2 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 46: 6R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
46%	38%	42	331	265	60	27"	1920 1080	SPT0ABF C27

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE IV GENE Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE - $594

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	71x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	52x
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x

RAM
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 3x8GBHynixBench 52%, 52 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 4x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 559 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $790

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16