Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 01:23
Run Duration	610 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 81.9 49% 72.4 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 154 21% 154 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C606) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3062 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 128GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 14 2 5.2 0.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3.8 Write 2.3 SusWrite 4.8 3% 3.63 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 75%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 96GB free Firmware: JE3OA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 66 67 68 72 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 65 Write 63.6 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 66.3 39% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 50%
Generic- SD/MMC 128GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 0GB free, PID 1220 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.2 Write 11.3 Mixed 17.1 22% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 29% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB 8,570 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	166x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	162x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	71x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	239x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	165x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	18x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	52x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples	35x
QUM3S-8G1333C9 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 22 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16