Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140915
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 23:50
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 206
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 619
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 58.5
52% 61.4 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 58.7
51% 63 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 60 54 43 40 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 460
Write 428
Mixed 340
SusWrite 70.5
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 42.8
152% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 230
206% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
415GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 147 148 148 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 170
Mixed 107
SusWrite 146
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
911GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 169 170 171 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 154
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 169
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
927GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 171 172 173 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 158
Mixed 102
SusWrite 171
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 171 171 171 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 160
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 170
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$84
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 36.7
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 5 144 26.9" 1280 720 AUS27A6 XG27VQ
Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback