Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 192% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 181% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 21:44
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 149 2-Core 284 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 934 89% 737 Pts	64-Core 1,177 73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Gigabyte(1458 4085) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	204% Outstanding	Lighting 296 Reflection 274 Parallax 313 241% 294 fps	MRender 352 Gravity 253 Splatting 191 208% 265 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 1TB-$77 2,710 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 193 170 139 213 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 470 Write 380 Mixed 309 SusWrite 196 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 20.8 81% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 198 177% 267 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 108%
Intel Optane+3.6TBHDD 19 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: 16.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 240 247 249 246 253 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 120%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74 4,600 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3GB free Firmware: 040H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 354 Write 249 Mixed 260 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 24.7 102% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 51.5 57% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 81%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 59GB free Firmware: UH44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 104 20 108 67 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 331 Write 255 Mixed 202 SusWrite 86.2 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 12.3 54% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 46.7 DQ Mixed 19.2 31% 61 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 58%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB 10,780 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 293GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 151 150 151 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 147 Write 150 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 149 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 114%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 12TB 454 User benchmarks, average bench 202% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 342 339 340 352 337 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 348 Write 317 Mixed 102 SusWrite 342 201% 277 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.1 1,503% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 285%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 4x8GB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 36.4 MC Mixed 27.1 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 41.2 SC Mixed 27.8 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27.2"	1280 720	GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,513x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	833x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	573x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	401x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	339x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16