MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 272
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,032
94% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,565
97% 1,565 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 207
Parallax 233
174% 218 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 216
Splatting 171
172% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 159%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
515GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1512 1274 1218 1275 1270 1217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,413
Write 2,093
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 1,294
408% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 55.2
207% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 828
616% 825 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 276%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
903GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 465 469 468 473 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 476
Mixed 430
SusWrite 468
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 46.2
161% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
2TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 193 196 197 196 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 106
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 194
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 6400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.9 6.2 9.7 6.2 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Read 36.8
Write 30.3
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 8.4
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.9
57% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 73: 10R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
73% 36% 58 292 218 144 27" 2560 1440 GSM5B7F 27GL850
History: Score 41: 5R 3G 7B | Score 73: 10R 6G 5B
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 14,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $810
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback