Gigabyte GA-H310N 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310N 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 19:38
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$295 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 91 1-Core 156 2-Core 306 100% 184 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 934 88% 730 Pts	64-Core 1,215 75% 1,215 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% EVGA(3842 6775) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 132 Parallax 123 105% 128 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 129 Splatting 112 92% 112 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 101%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 660 656 637 572 580 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,126 Write 1,071 Mixed 992 SusWrite 623 214% 953 MB/s	4K Read 60.5 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 78.8 260% 88.5 MB/s	DQ Read 926 DQ Write 675 DQ Mixed 752 575% 784 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60 17,279 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 22.3 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 37.2 SC Mixed 25.6 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	144	34.1"	1280 720	GSM76FE LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310N 2.0 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310N 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	26x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	17x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	6x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	10x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	6x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	5x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 78%, 1,125 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16