Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130410
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100 29,222 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 121 57% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 303 34% 268 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.5% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 74.1 Parallax 67.5 57% 70.5 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 66.3 56% 68 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 252 248 245 243 242 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 416 Mixed 366 SusWrite 258 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 46.9 155% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 260 195% 260 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 118GB 1,345 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 71GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 94 73 86 86 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 419 Write 191 Mixed 266 SusWrite 111 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 17.9 70% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 72.7 DQ Mixed 14.7 33% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 97%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 524GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 139 143 145 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 130 Write 121 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 142 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 680GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 163 158 154 175 174 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 132 Write 104 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 163 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 107%
Toshiba HDWU130 3TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 58GB free Firmware: MZ6OACK0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 79 84 83 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 127 Write 121 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 82.6 64% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 89%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 108GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 92 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 98.1 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 93.6 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 85%
MXT-USB Storage Device 16GB 662 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 14GB free, PID 8816 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	4.16% Terrible	Read 5.2 Write 5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5.2 7% 4.97 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 54% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.16% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	23.5"	1280 720	ACI24F3 ASUS VH242H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	74x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	50x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	14x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	161x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	66x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16