Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 14:09
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 97.4
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 148
67% 107 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 263
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 18
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.6
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 122 133 119 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 178
Write 188
Mixed 159
SusWrite 125
37% 162 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 23.7
79% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 35.3
32% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
253GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 201 203 204 207 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 147
Write 143
Mixed 169
SusWrite 201
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 31.2
98% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 79.4
DQ Mixed 49.5
40% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 3R 6G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 24% 55 76 15 60 27" 1920 1080 PHLC096 273PQPY
Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback