Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 12:01
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 124 54% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 347 34% 281 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3793) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.9% Good	Lighting 92.7 Reflection 87.7 Parallax 77.1 76% 85.8 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 79.8 Splatting 70.9 59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 113 69 58 56 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 394 Write 276 Mixed 332 SusWrite 99.8 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 37.9 126% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 50.6 45% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 153GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 91 95 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 91.6 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 91.7 64% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.8% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	120	27"	1280 720	HPN3443 HP 27x Curved

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	7x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 350 samples	2x
Team-Elite-1333 Team-Elite-1333 16GBUnknownBench 41%, 48 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $269

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16